The software doesn’t change. Who answers for it does.
Enterprise is one agreement between your organisation and us, covering everybody
in it. No new tier, no upgrade, nothing your people have to learn — the
same platform they are using today, with everything that matters to the company written
down and signed.
Starting from CHF 9,500 a year. Priced for the organisation, not per
person — the rate is agreed rather than read off a list, and what moves it is size
and how much of the platform you turn on.
Hosted in the EU and SwitzerlandISO 27001 certifiedExport everything, any time
You do not need a requirements document — a list of questions is enough.
Two differences: an enclosure, and a signature
Nothing is wrong with your tools. Nobody can answer for all of them.
Your CRM is good at being a CRM. Finance, the ticket queue, the design tools — each
chosen by people who knew what they needed, each better than anything trying to do all of
them. None of them knows about the others.
AI arrived the same way, one team at a time, each purchase reasonable. But software does not
answer for itself. Who set the limit for the whole company? Who decided what the
finance team’s assistant may reach? Who signed for the data? Nobody has
agreed to. That is what Enterprise is.
Question 01
Who set the limit for the whole company?
Name
Question 02
Who decided what finance’s assistant may reach?
Name
Question 03
Who signed for the data?
Name
Three questions a company is expected to answer. Today none of them has a name against it.
Nothing drawn here except the absence — scroll it sideways
It starts making sense where somebody other than the user has to answer for the tool
— a governance threshold, not a headcount.
Somewhere real
TVB Mayrhofen — an Austrian tourism board — runs its own
knowledge through the Smart Company OS in daily guest-services work. Not an organisation
of a thousand people, and we will not pretend otherwise. It answers a different
question: whether this runs somewhere real.
Other organisations have run proof-of-concepts on it, and we run Aitronos on it
ourselves — our own documents, our own questions, every working day.
Seven things change when the organisation is the one buying.
A ceiling, set before the spend.
Spending limits organisation-wide and per key. Quotas per person, so one team’s
experiment cannot eat the budget. Usage broken down per person, per department and per
model — so the report answers who, not only how much.
One access model, not one per team.
Seven roles out of the box, Owner down to Guest, and three presets —
collaborative, balanced, controlled. Departments in a tree matching your own, managers
scoped to their branch. Guest is a hard boundary: five capabilities, every
organisation-wide sharing path closed.
Where it runs, written in.
EU and Swiss residency as a contract term, not a setting somebody ticked. Where that is
not enough, models, knowledge and automation can run on infrastructure you control
— the furthest being the Aitronos Box: the
whole platform on a machine in your building, specified for what you run. Arranged, not
selected from a menu.
Support that answers to you.
Named contacts, not a queue. A coverage window, response times by severity, an uptime
target we commit to, and an allowance of our people’s time for implementation and
training. Each is set in the agreement, which is why no figure is printed here.
A say in what gets built.
Not development to order. What an organisation on this agreement asks for goes to the
people who set the roadmap, and weighs more there than any single user’s request.
What you actually sign.
A data processing agreement, and the compliance commitments your legal and security
teams require. A usage and volume agreement, so the metered half of the bill is bounded
in advance. One invoice, not a card per department.
Included in the agreement
If we do not have the connector, we build it.
More than a thousand systems already connect, and a knowledge source can be almost
anything you already store. If the one your work actually runs on is not among them, we
build the connector for it — any system, at no cost, for as long as the agreement
runs. It is the one thing on this page we do build to order, and it never becomes a line
on the invoice.
The security review, answered on the way in.
You are going to forward this to a reviewer. Most of what comes back is already answered
here.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 — certificate IC-IS-2606004, issued to
Aitronos AG by InterCert on 1 June 2026. Surveillance to 31 May 2027, recertification
to 31 May 2029.
A tamper-evident audit trail, exportable, covering who did what and when.
GDPR as mechanism, not policy: Article 20 export, Article 17 deletion, an Article 30
processor register, retention rules you set.
Every organisation isolated from every other on the platform.
Security review — returned questions4 of 5 answered
Certification held?
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 — IC-IS-2606004
Audit trail?
Tamper-evident, exportable
Deletion and export?
GDPR Art. 17 / Art. 20
Tenant separation?
Every organisation isolated
Our own retention policy?
Yours to set
Four of five, answered before your reviewer asks — scroll it sideways
The signed certificate is one press away — the PDF exactly as InterCert issued it.
The policy library, the sub-processor list and the data processing agreement can be
requested from the Trust Center at trust.aitronos.com.
Send your reviewer straight there; you need not be in the room.
Not a demo. A conversation with the people who would run your deployment: what you already
have and what would connect first. You leave with the certificate and the data
processing agreement whether or not it goes further.